City to hear Family Dollar appeal

A view of the proposed site for the Family Dollar store. Photo available for purchase

A view of the proposed site for the Family Dollar store.

Published: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 at 12:52 PM.

Members of Apalachicola’s city commission will hear an appeal by Family Dollar March 11, the latest chapter in an effort by the retailer to overcome neighbors’ objections and relocate to a wooded site on U.S. 98 on the western edge of Apalachicola.

In January, Panama City attorney Robert Hughes appealed the Planning and Zoning Commission’s Nov. 18, 2013 vote that gave a resounding no to a proposal to relocate the store from its current site adjacent to the Gulfside IGA to a lot that neighbors the Best Western Inn.

Hughes, who represents Blue Current Development LLC, the firm of Panama City Beach’s Brett Woodward, sought to have the action overturned by the Board of Adjustment, claiming the city’s zoning approval process was riddled with errors and impropriety.

City Attorney Pat Floyd last month reviewed Hughes’ filing, and determined that the proper avenue would be for the developer to go directly to the city commission, after paying a $500 fee. At the city commission’s Feb. 4 meeting, it was agreed to hold the appeals hearing on Tuesday, March 11 at 6 p.m. in the commission chambers at Battery Park. An appeal to the city is a prerequisite if the developer should go to circuit court, and seek to recover damages.

Hughes wants the city to reverse P & Z’s denial of the special exception request, and to direct city commissioners to grant the retail a specialty store exception found in the C-3 commercial zoning. Woodward wants to construct a more than 8,300-square foot store on 1.16 acres at U.S. 98 and Clairmont.

The lawyer argues P & Z’s unanimous vote in April 2012 to confirm that “the operation is consistent within the C-3 zoning district” led to Woodward spending about $302,000 on the project, including about $245,000 for the land, $24,000 for civil design work, $9,300 for legal fees, $9,000 for architectural work, $8,500 for surveying work, and $6,000 for environmental work.

In his recounting of what he says are the facts of the case, Hughes cited City Administrator Betty Webb’s Sept. 19, 2012 follow-up letter confirming the initial P & Z vote as “justifiable reliance” upon which Woodward went ahead to buy the property a month later. He said Blue Current “worked diligently in late 2012 and spring of 2013 to develop its site plan in conformity with the city’s land development code.”

1 2

Reader comments posted to this article may be published in our print edition. All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be re-published without permission. Links are encouraged.

▲ Return to Top